Lever

Pros: It's quite simple to use and the interface is very straightforward. There are filters that you can use to filter the job postings by location, department, work type, etc. The application form is easy to pre-fill by uploading a CV. We also use it for our internal referral program.

Cons: The interface is too simple and a bit bland. I would add more design on the page. Otherwise, it has all the main functionality.

Pros: Did not have any pros. Support was unresponsive and did not meet the terms and conditions of the agreement.

Cons: Never got up and running support never reach out with 4 support tickets. Integrations never worked. Sales rep promises were never met.

Pros: Lever was very compatible with our teams outside of HR and recruiting, hiring managers were easy to collaborate with through Lever's features and interface. Overall, Lever was easy to use, even for those who were not trained on the platform.

Cons: Lever comes with some quirks with implementation, and there are certain features like filtering that I would like to see when considering the value for what you pay.

Pros: Ease of use. Fairly intuitive. We are able to complete tasks quicker. Posting jobs has been very efficient and easy to track in one place.

Cons: It does not carry over resume and notes when adding a candidate from LinkedIn Recruiter to Lever ATS

Pros: Lever was a great introductory ATS for our company when we we smaller and growing, especially with a limited recruiting team.

Cons: Lever's functionality feels more limited than their competitors at this point. Compared to other ATS tools we're evaluating, the AI functionality is more limited, the native signature feature requires additional spend on DocuSign, and the integration with Rippling as an HRIS hasn't advanced over the years.

Pros: Ease of use, integrates well with scheduling/calendaring, candidate management, job posting integration to the site.

Cons: Reporting/Dashboards are trickier to learn. Still not quite there. The reporting functionality might be a bit too overdone. I'd think of ways to simplify it.

Pros: easy to use but has so many features, what i like the most is the LinkedIn lever connection

Cons: at this point I am satisfied with everything

Pros: User-friendly and easily organizes my recruitment process.

Cons: Inability to customize colors.

Pros: I like that is tit serves a repository of information and allows for you to easily archive your candidates

Cons: I do not like that it is a standalone and does not integrate with Paycor or Paycom. This causes duplicity with entries. I also do not like that you cannot include additional documents such as health benefits information along with the offer letters. It only allows the offer to go out

Pros: Lever was simple for our IT team to set up and get integrated with our Outlook calendars and emails.

Cons: The site itself seemed a bit dated and lacked the customization that our team required when it came to scheduling.

Pros: It’s pretty customizable, functionality is good for recruiters.

Cons: Frequent bugs/glitchy, reporting dashboard could be better, can’t attach word docs to the req requests so it’s inconvenient to have to copy and paste everything in a small box.

Pros: Lever is pretty straightforward to use. Its function is to display the resume of candidates for a job offer

Cons: The program in our usecase does very little from my view point. It would be easier if there was one application that would just do what the 10 individual ones do in the hiring process.

Pros: Easy to use, integrates with LinkedIn, has permission system, respects GDPR

Cons: More features meaning is not as snappy as it could be (UI is getting slower)

Pros: That is scalable corporate grade solution. Different providers of digital signature are supported. Stable work of application combined with reliable data storage. No errors experienced. Awesome dashboards and tools for performance rewiev and capabilities for continuous performance tracking since of sourcing, offer digital sign, onboarding and KPI tracking to hardware and policy documents assignments.

Cons: No solution for work force sourcing. That limits us for using it for construction industry and we are missing for access to contractors data bases. Above the average pricing. Time tracking needs attendance controls automation. Applicant resume parsing needs browser capabilities to be switched on. Good to have unified CV profile applicable to different ATS. Hard to migrate from previous ATS to Lever and needs specific mapping. Can have limits for using in offshore locations.

Pros: Ease of Use and implementation. The help videos were very useful. Good UI

Cons: Some limitations in customization - final rating scale in feedback form. Salary structure in offer process is not easy to create. Had issues integrating with Linkedin . Limited time for implementation calls

Pros: Interface is simple and easy to navigate

Cons: Some addon notifications on req assignments to recruiters would be helpful to add and reporting dashboard has several confusing fields

Pros: Easy to use and generally intuitive. Functionality was well thought out.

Cons: Sometimes lacked the necessary functionality and integrations necessary to make it 100% effective.

Pros: The interview scheduling capabilities. Being able to reach out to multiple candidates for availability and schedule them seamlessly.

Cons: Hiring managers seem to be able to schedule an interview and it would be nice to be able to prevent certain users from scheduling interviews. Also I would like to be able to Bold candidate names again after they have already been viewed in the pipeline.

Pros: What we appreciated most about Lever is its flexibility in data and privacy management, adapting well to the specific requirements of different countries.

Cons: However, the unified pipeline presents challenges, as it forces us to include certain steps only relevant in specific regions. This setup requires HR to manually manage candidate movement through each stage, as delegating this to hiring managers could lead to confusion with steps unique to certain countries, potentially complicating the hiring process.

Pros: The robust candidate management system, the referral management process, the interview scheduling, the overall ease of use of the system.

Cons: Job lists don't sync up with LinkedIn. Have to paste whole descriptions in the intro box. Not a big deal.

Pros: I like Lever because of its ease of use. It's also great for bulk candidate management, especially for those who handle volume roles. It also has integration with a lot of job boards which leads to a good flow of applicants.

Cons: The reporting module is not the greatest, we have had to integrate it with another app for reports. It also lacks a lot of automation, which can be a downside for busy recruiters.

Pros: Ease of implementation, reporting, easy to use and train users.

Cons: One unified workflow...would like to be able to have different workflows based on department.

Pros: The platform is incredibly easy and simple to use. Our hiring managers like the ease and simplicity of being able to review applicants efficiently (quickly). Also having the ability to pull a candidate into the candidate pool if the recruiter didn't include them.

Cons: Not ideal for very large corporations who need a more robust solution.

Pros: Lever has been a game-changer for us. It's incredibly user-friendly and intuitive, making our daily tasks a breeze. The customer support and implementation team have been fantastic (especially Tom), guiding us through every step. We love how streamlined and efficient it's made our recruitment workflows. Plus, the analytics and reporting tools are top-notch, giving us valuable insights. It's clear that Lever was designed with the future of recruitment in mind.

Cons: While Lever is generally user-friendly, there’s a bit of a learning curve, especially when diving into the more advanced features and customizations.