Testsigma

Pros: I cannot have a positive thing to say about Testsigma as I have not heard from the point person managing initial stages of attempting to try out the application.

Cons: Testsigma's account representatives are very unprofessional. We started a security review, and they never completed it. When followed up regarding what was going on from their end I have yet to receive any replies via e-mail for the past month. Called their support/sales line, and the person who answered had screaming children in the background along with no professional acumen. Didn't identify that it was TestSigma just answered the phone 'Yes'. If this is how you run your company honestly, I don't have any interest in using your product, but would like to warn anyone before attempting to engage as you may well be wasting your time if your company has any scrutiny over security issues with outside vendor tools.

Pros: TestSigma is easy to learn and explain to others. It is not the easiest package out there but good enough. Their support channels and documentation is superb. The extend of what this application can do is exactly what we need as a growing team and organization. With the presence of options in TestSigma we can work and grow for many more years.

Cons: The learning curve was not to hard but TestSigma has some Layers that you need to understand in order to be proficient with it. I really recommend to watch their webinars and plan half an hour reading their onboarding documentation. After this it's just a matter of learning while playing.

Pros: 1)The Testsigma can be used by a new user with a minimum amount of training. 2) The test step grouping feature is another unique feature that reduces the time required to develop a new script

Cons: A substantial portion of the Testsigma team's attention needs to be devoted to the reporting feature. It has very limited capabilities at the moment. There is a need to integrate Salesforce features.

Pros: The ease of use for non-developer QA team members in terms of writing steps for the automation and execution of the test cases. Elements are stored in a central location which makes maintenance of them easier with search and filter capabilities. In addition, the product provides "data profiles" that enable scalability of the testing in an effortless manner.

Cons: Web pages take time to load while adding steps and therefore the process is slightly tedious.

Pros: -> Easy to set up the tool -> Creation of test scripts is very simple since its scriptless using NLP commands -> In-built integration with Jenkins helped us to setup CI/CD easily -> Ability to re-use test cases when grouped as step groups saves time and avoids redundancy -> Very user friendly to build test script since tool provides samples and examples for each test case -> In Test runs, for the failed cases, along with the error tool helps us with possible reasons for the occurrence of the issue, which helps us to debug the issue.

Cons: -> Custom functions provided sometimes didn’t work for specific use-cases, which were resolved soon. -> Lack of a tight integration with Jenkins for test reports. -> Lack of support for few testing scenarios outside the app context

Pros: They are a company which listens to their customers

Cons: Some minor issues with stability when we first implemented

Pros: Being able to automate repetitive UI interactions is very impressive, such as automating login, the input of data, button clicks, and validating report data.

Cons: Sometimes it was tough to identify the correct HTML element (such as an input box) when nested within iframes. There could be more examples of how to overcome this.

Pros: Relatively easy to pick up by non-technical QA with a few hours spent on workshops with Test Sigma to educate on the basic usage. Record and playback lets you get a base setup quickly. Custom methods support extension of test cases by allowing us to write our own code for complex scenarios. Fast, fresh GUI that was pretty intuitive. Support scheduled jobs and Jenkins integration. Support team are outstanding. We even got interviewed to give feedback on Pro's and Con's and felt we had influence over the Roadmap so as to get our needs met.

Cons: Test Case hierarchy and ability to group the numerous Test Cases and Test Steps began to be a challenge as this was not the best executed part of the product. Sometimes it was hard to get consistency in our Test Cases, some due to the product not being able to accurately identify an element and some due to our own complex DOM. These issues were often resolved very promptly.

Pros: The tool helped us improve the automation coverage of our suite and in turn for faster releases. Few points to highlight would be the script-less automation, ease of integration with other tools and parallel testing. Their support team was always ready to resolve our queries. We are happy with their quality of services and will definitely continue to use your tool. Thank you."

Cons: Sometimes we had faced sporadic failures wit element identification, had issues with custom functions built by Testsigma for specific use-cases but even those were rectified immediately after reaching out to their support folks.

Pros: the way to find and inspect the web elements on a page

Cons: the way to calculate and fill the time in a test case it should be editable and heritable by test case in passed

Pros: - great NLP features - good project management - responsive customer suport

Cons: - hard to write code & not recommended for automation oriented testers

Pros: Automation testing Is the best part of test sigma,one need not have the knowledge of coding to use this

Cons: I don't think that there are any cons regarding the software

Pros: Easy to automate different phases of STLC like Development, maintain and reporting.

Cons: Few enhancements in UI which is under development.

Pros: * Low barrier to entry! I'm not an engineer and didn't want to waste time learning a programming language to get our Part 11 Validation testing framework up and running. I have been able to make hundreds of tests which are specific to user acceptance criteria yet flexible enough to handle being general build-acceptance testing. * Instead of buying different devices or workstations with dozens of permutations, I can choose from nearly all of the currently and previously available browser/OS combinations. * The screenshot capability as well as the video generated by each test has made writing up reports easier.

Cons: * The reporting is not at all flexible. I had to use Grafana to create a custom dashboard of the results so that my team could see at-a-glance how all the test suites which ran overnight did. In addition, I have to do a heck of a lot of massaging to get reports which an be used for the Part 11 report. I've repeatedly asked for the ability to customize the dashboard, but it's not a priority for their product team. * Do not expect automated UI testing to be fast. * Inability to link test suites so that when one ends, the next is kicked off. There is a workaround for this, but it requires multiple parallel user accounts. * Plan ahead when naming your tests. The organization capacity is a little lacking, so I had to use the naming conventions to ensure I have included all the tests in the correct set in the correct order.

Pros: It was really easy to start making tests with Testsigma. I have never done any test cases before, but after watching a five-minute video it took about an hour to make six test suites to test all primary website functions.

Cons: It has a lot of hidden potential so I could use Testsigma in more complex way. Automated tests were not so easy to find.

Pros: $76

Cons: 1. Lack of support for DB testing but possible with custom function 2. Reports could be clearer 3. Lack of full-page screenshot in some browsers but possible with custom function 4. Lack of feature to compare 2 screenshots/images for better cross browser testing

Pros: If I can give a 7 stars here, will be glad to do it. About usage is very friendly after you read the documentations. Implementing the test here are so easy it is like talking to another person. Super full supporting with the click option to capture the fields and menus.

Cons: This is a overall tool that maybe not apply 100% to you platform. But the support to get it to 100% is super good.