TestMu AI

Pros: Integration is simple, and the team provides great support when customization is needed. Scaling the solution is effortless, and the documentation is thorough and easy to understand.

Cons: The dashboard and metrics have improved considerably, and I’m sure more updates and enhancements are on the way.

Pros: Fast AI-generated test cases, improved coverage with edge cases, and an easy-to-use interface that saves time in QA workflows.

Cons: Some features still feel limited, and the AI-generated tests sometimes require manual adjustments to better fit specific scenarios.

Pros: TestMu AI provides a solid testing platform with a good balance of automation, usability, and device coverage. The platform is easy to navigate, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced QA engineers. Test management features help organize test cases efficiently, and the automation support significantly speeds up regression testing.

Cons: Some advanced features require a learning curve Occasional minor bugs or delays during heavy testing sessions Documentation could be more detailed for complex integrations

Pros: It is super easy to test or replicate issues using the devices our team does not own 'physically'. This allowed us to shorten the time-to-resolution for device-specific or browser-specific issues tremendously.

Cons: There are not many downsides for the use cases we have - TestMu AI is fast, directly applicable to our work specifics.

Pros: Easy to use and intuitive interface Helps generate test cases quickly, saving time Improves test coverage with AI-driven suggestions Reduces manual effort in writing repetitive test scenarios Speeds up the overall QA process Useful for both functional and edge-case testing Enhances productivity for developers and QA teams Good support for automation-ready outputs

Cons: AI suggestions sometimes lack context of real business logic Generated test cases may require manual refinement Limited customization in certain scenarios Can occasionally produce generic or repetitive outputs Learning curve for maximizing its full potential Dependency on input quality — better prompts give better results Not always accurate for highly complex workflows May miss domain-specific edge cases

Pros: What I liked most about TestMu AI is how easily and reliably it lets us test our web app across a wide variety of iOS and Android devices – everything just works well.

Cons: No major issues; it’s been smooth and stable. But not all OS versions are available for a given device sometimes.

Pros: I especially like the ease of being able to test our sites in a multitude of different browsers and operating systems without having to have the actual systems around.

Cons: In the absolute beginning of our test journey we tried accessing one of our private sites that was not accessible on the open internet at that time and it took us a few minutes to download and enable the integrated tunnel - but that was entirely on us, the UI did not hide that feature at all.

Pros: TestMu AI pleasantly surprised me with its accuracy, speed, and ease of use. The interface is intuitive, the features are powerful, and the automation saves a huge amount of time during testing. I especially appreciate how smoothly test management and browser/device testing work. Everything feels polished and reliable.

Cons: I honestly didn’t encounter anything significant to complain about. Some features could be expanded even further in the future, but the current experience is already excellent.

Pros: Excellent support for testing across a wide range of devices and browsers, making cross-platform checks easy. Helps catch compatibility issues early by letting you run the same link on different environments. Saves time compared to maintaining your own device lab. Simple and intuitive interface — tests are easy to set up and run. Reliable cloud-based access means the team can test from anywhere without hardware constraints.

Cons: Can feel overwhelming at first due to the number of options available. Test results can sometimes feel delayed under heavy load times (depends on plan/parallel sessions).

Pros: Speed & Capability which is excellent for Parallel testing.Detail reposting give much clarity. Ai powered Automation helps to speed up work.

Cons: It's expensive for small teams. Also it is slow & delays in UI when managing large suites. One more is there is no many screen resolutions.

Pros: What I liked most about TestMu AI is how it brings test management, automation, bug tracking, and browser/device testing into one unified platform. The AI-assisted test case creation saves a significant amount of time and reduces manual effort. The automation features are easy to configure, even for non-technical team members, and the ability to run tests across multiple browsers and devices is extremely helpful. I also appreciate the clean dashboard and real-time reporting, which make it easy to track progress and identify issues quickly.

Cons: While the platform is powerful, there can be a slight learning curve when setting up advanced automation workflows. Some of the more advanced features may require clearer documentation or onboarding tutorials. Additionally, performance can occasionally slow down when running large batches of tests simultaneously, though this hasn’t significantly impacted overall productivity.

Pros: It’s easy to start using and requires minimal setup. UI is also clean The session recording feature is useful for capturing issues and sharing exact behavior with clients or developers during manual testing.

Cons: Real device availability has been a major issue in our use. New iPhones and Ultra devices are frequently unavailable or show “Device Not Available,” sometimes for long periods. Specially during our peak hours. There is also a gap between the device list you see on Free Trial and what can actually be accessed at the exact same time. Devices appear selectable but cannot be launched on paid plan when needed, making me question the entire point of this Over time, we also saw reliability decline, with sessions failing to start or dropping during manual testing more often than expected.

Pros: So you can buy a whole lot of computers and operation system licenses to test your website, or you just use this tool.

Cons: I don't use any automations, so I can't say much about that. I will make damn sure no AI is interfering with my work here.

Pros: TestMu AI is a practical solution that helps reduce the time spent on repetitive testing tasks. It has ability to generate test cases and test documentation. The UI is straightforward and doesn't feel bloated. The learning curve is lighter compared to other platforms.

Cons: There are areas where automation and integration could be improved. Like most AI-driven tools, the AI output still requires human review.

Pros: TestMU AI (prior LambdaTest) is an excellent cloud based testing platform which helped us testing out apps over multiple cloud devices. It provides many variations in which a user can select ranging from Android to iOS, with sim without sin devices. Excellant tool

Cons: Basically the sessions recordings were not great and few of the devices were responding slow subject to their data centres reach and availablity

Pros: I use LambdaTest frequently for both regression and cross browser testing, and it has genuinely simplified my day to day work. Launching different browser and OS combinations is fast, and it’s a big plus that I no longer need to manage a separate device lab or multiple virtual machines. Overall performance is reliable, and running tests in parallel has noticeably reduced our execution time during busy sprint periods.

Cons: The interface, however, can sometimes feel a little busy, particularly when trying to sift through logs or older session records. I’ve also run into a few instances where test sessions were slightly sluggish, which can be annoying when dealing with timing sensitive defects. With smoother navigation and more flexible, configurable reporting screens, it would align even more naturally with my QA workflow.

Pros: What I like most about LambdaTest is the easy access to real devices and different iOS versions in one platform. It helps me test iOS and Flutter apps without managing physical devices. The interface is simple and testing setup is quick. It saves a lot of time in daily development and release cycles.

Cons: Sometimes there is a waiting time for popular real devices during peak hours. Also, a few devices can feel a bit slow when the network is not stable. However, overall performance and usability are still good for regular testing work.

Pros: Wide browser and device coverage without needing physical devices. Easy to use, stable sessions, and saves a lot of time for small teams and startups.

Cons: Some sessions can be slightly slow during peak hours, and advanced features take time to get used to.

Pros: I highly recommend LambdaTest for its extensive range of devices and versions. It offers better value for money than competitors, and the subscription is definitely worth the investment. The platform features robust security and great test management, while the automation integration is seamless and easy to execute.

Cons: They can make it less latency like other rivals in same space. They can also add more documentation.

Pros: I liked the AI‑native testing approach for natural language tests, the agent to agent for chatbots, plus fast cloud execution and strong integrations. It feels cohesive and powerful.

Cons: Pricing feels opaque and too many AI agent products makes it hard to know what is included per tier.

Pros: LambdaTest is a solid platform for testing React Native apps across multiple devices, OS versions, and screen sizes. It’s especially useful for validating UI behavior, layout consistency, and cross-platform issues without maintaining physical devices. Parallel testing and quick setup add strong value for money.

Cons: Support for native mobile features is limited. Testing biometric authentication (Face ID / Fingerprint), social login flows, and push notifications is not fully supported or realistic on cloud devices, which can block complete end-to-end validation for React Native apps.

Pros: The things which I really like about lambdaTest is its huge ranges of devices support for both platforms Android as well as iOS. This really helps in covering all the edge cases throughout all the devices to provide best output to its users.

Cons: The thing which I dislike about lambda test is the learning curve for advance features like customisation of test devices feels a bit complex, the other thing which I dislike is sometimes there is a latency in devices.

Pros: As a security professional, I find LambdaTest to be the best platform for mobile app testing I've used so far. Its extensive range of mobile device combinations and real-time testing capabilities ensure that my applications perform flawlessly across various environments. Overall, LambdaTest has significantly enhanced my mobile testing workflow.

Cons: While I appreciate LambdaTest, the main drawback is the absence of an App Store for iOS testing. Despite this, the platform offers numerous benefits that outweigh this minor limitation.