SpiraTeam

Pros: Ho iniziato a usare questo software durante un breve corso aziendale. È abbastanza facile scrivere i vari step dei macroscenari, una volta individuati

Cons: Il nuovo aggiornamento ha cambiato radicalmente la dashboard e quindi ci vuole un attimo per trovare le informazioni che si cercano

Pros: I like that SpiraTeam is a one-stop shop for all Application Life Cycle needs. Also, it is a great tool for software or products.

Cons: The layers of details could be optional.

Pros: Inflectra SpiraTeam is a product that works satisfactorily with multiple browsers such as Chome, Opera and Firefox without presenting compatibility problems, it is very easy to manage and maintain and another positive aspect is the robust integration with AxoSoft OnTime. My recommendation is to work day by day with Inflectra SpiraTeam and request technical assistance if necessary. Also, I recommend asking Inflectra to add more features in a new release. SpiraTeam has a lot to improve, but it is on the right track.

Cons: There are many improvements that the Inflectra SpiraTeam team can implement in a new update, for example, the grids, custom reports and the requirements module. SpiraTeam should implement and add more custom reporting options, improve testing functionality, and increase the speed of the requirement module.

Pros: I have been using this product for almost 10years for my quality team. I really like the product; it is very easy to use, very easy to track team's performance , easy to do requirement traceability ,easy to assign tasks for the team. Overall a great product.

Cons: I am satisfied with the features I am using.

Pros: SpiraTeam is clear and intuitive to use. The cockpits are a good starting point for daily work.

Cons: The structure of the requirements is not transferred from DevOps and after grouping the original types are lost.

Pros: You are able to configure almost anything. This allowed us to generate reports and screens appropriate to two clients.

Cons: Some names of fields seem contrived and not everything is in the expected place. But these will be transient problems.

Pros: $7c

Cons: Upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0 fails. In the past upgrading other vendor tools has been a deal breaker when it failed. A tool should be able to upgrade itself without throwing any SQL errors or similar. Administrators and DBA's should not need to run any specific scripts or commands, the tool should do this automatically and without error. We are unable to take advantage of new features offered in 6.0 and beyond. Integration of any test tool with a business is not easy because the tool forces you to work its way rather than the tool supporting existing processes. I needed to write a VB script to translate/transpose my test scripts into the correct format for importing into SpiraTeam, as a consequence of the tool forcing the tester to work how the tool works.

Pros: the feauture i like mosto are remote launch, easy to duplicate project structure

Cons: it's difficult tu upgrade the version. It will be appreciate a automate tool for version update

Pros: The Software made Automation easier. Integration easy, total revolutionary product. Very powerful tool if used as designed.

Cons: Users. Misunderstanding the designed use compared to their personal opinion.

Pros: Where you are in the B2B market and have tech clients who remain Waterfall in their planning, yet you are more enlightened, this is a suitable tool. It does allow you to plan your dev trains according to iterations and project onto a scrum board. At the same time it allows you to map these cards to a set of requirements. In addition, you can plan your test cases and track defects all in the one platform. Sure, you could go down the Atlassian route, Inflectra appears to be better value for money, especially when adding modules.

Cons: Insufficient integrations available with market defacto standard testing tools. The training model is on a consulting model - not great for start ups and scale ups. Need more training videos dealing with the set up in situations of increasing complexity! Was advised that Inflectra is responsive to customer feedback feature requests. Have not experienced this yet, despite regular feedback. Because most teams spend so much time in the Planning Board, more investment is required to improve usability of this page. Its good, just not great yet. It would be great to restrict visibility of external users to specific pages or to specific cards, instead we have to create separate projects for these groups, which is not always ideal when inserting external groups into internal team work.

Pros: I like that we can see the work move across the Planning (Kanban) Board so it gives great visibility to the entire team of the work that is being done. It is great for agile approach to software development. It provides great integration from Requirement to Development to Testing to Completed.

Cons: The toughest part of using this new tool was to determine at what level to put the requirements into the system. As we were transitioning to agile at the same time we determined to put features into the tool as requirements and write user stories for each feature. It worked well. My team experienced some clunkiness, but I believe it was the way we had the tool configured as opposed to the tool itself. We changed the permissions on a couple of roles (BA, Developer) and it worked much better. We also changed some of the default workflows to make it work better.

Pros: Nice features,integration with most of the automation tools,ease of navigation,easy to understand UI,tracking of tasks,version control,access as per roles,easy tracking of all artifacts and easy to understand the mappings with them.

Cons: Reporting can be much better.Sometimes some formats throw error while reporting,mostly detailed incident reports fail while attaching images other than jpeg formats.

Pros: Recently, I used some of its custom reporting functionality and was amazed at the easy interface and the out-of-the-box functionality. Very good.

Cons: At this point, I can't think of anything as they have a good roadmap, webinars, and user groups that support most of the immediate questions I have had.

Pros: solution complexity is good for managers and overview, graphs is good and transparent to users, notification is understandable

Cons: not so much user friendly mainly for simple users, navigation is not simple, default dashboard is complicated and too much data contains

Pros: Initial configuration of the system was pretty easy, and while there are many options to set up, everything is nicely presented and simple to follow.

Cons: Creating and editing workflows (like for defect mgmt) sometimes feels like more effort than it should be, and I think the interface for doing so could be improved.

Pros: Integration of all tools, open interfaces, online access from anywhere => to showcase example business cases to my customers, ease of use,

Cons: It would be good to have the possibility to create own reports, that can be used as official QA-Reports... every customer has his own QA-Reporting requirements (...but maybe I haven't found it yet...)

Pros: Feature set for the price compared to competing products. Flexible licensing. Very good support from the company.

Cons: Very occasionally can be slow, for no apparent reason. Validation against AD can be difficult to setup.

Pros: - easy administration - traceability over the whole development process - good test integration - integrated dokument versioning - good and fast support

Cons: - external test tool integration arn´t freeware anymore - text editor for inputs arn´t so good like in other tools

Pros: I like the concept of how test cases are arranged, within folders.

Cons: I don't like how the concept of the folders was implemented. Often times, when copying and pasting test cases, it gets placed in the wrong location. Have to spend extra time getting test cases and folders placed in the right location.

Pros: 1) great value for the money 2) flexibility 3) can help track all aspects of a project

Cons: I am still on version 4, so it may be that some of these are handled by v5 1) not tied in well enough with build systems 2) no test scheduling support supplied for linux systems 3) no simple way to tell which automated hosts are currently being used for automated testing. Should be some GUI screen that provides a single look at whats being scheduled and to what host.

Pros: Great variety of plugins

Cons: Limitations for some integrations, Jenkins will be a good example for that.