RiskProfiler

Pros: Takedown workflows were refreshingly automated. Instead of manual forms, RiskProfiler collected evidence, prefilled notices, and tracked provider responses. Watching malicious clones disappear in hours instead of days was satisfying.

Cons: When large-scale takedowns triggered simultaneously, dashboards lagged a bit. Nothing broke, but response slowed slightly under load.

Pros: Executive monitoring gave us visibility into forums discussing our leadership by name. It identified fake LinkedIn profiles reaching out to partners, which was both surprising and critical.

Cons: The steep learning curve showed up again—executive assistants struggled to interpret dashboards until security staff explained findings.

Pros: With dark web monitoring, RiskProfiler highlighted leaked credentials tied to old dev accounts still linked to repositories. That insight closed a blind spot we wouldn’t have noticed until exploited.

Cons: A lack of a mobile dashboard slowed the review cycle. Additional customization templates on top of the existing ones for the questionnaire will make the solution even better for users.

Pros: Brand intelligence worked brilliantly for us. It flagged fake social media handles impersonating executives and automatically assigned a severity score. The fact that it also tracked brand mentions across fringe forums made monitoring comprehensive.

Cons: Customization options could be richer. Our marketing team wanted dashboards tailored to campaigns, but the current layouts required manual adjustment.

Pros: The external surface monitoring found rogue assets internal scans missed. The ability to classify and group assets by exposure level makes prioritization easy.

Cons: we'd appreciate more automated recommendations for how to remediate flagged assets. UI scalability is solid, but visual density could be better organized for larger inventories.

Pros: The third-party module impressed me with continuous risk scoring tied to live vendor activity. It wasn’t just about questionnaires; it connected real signals like dark web chatter with vendor exposure.

Cons: Colleagues outside engineering found it difficult at first. Risk scores felt abstract until workshops explained how the numbers tied back to vendor weaknesses.

Pros: The internal and external asset maps are synced with CVE impact scores, making it easier for engineering and security to coordinate fixes. The attack path feature is very well structured.

Cons: I don't have much to complain about. But the customization options for the questionnaire set up can be worked on.

Pros: The external surface monitoring module uncovered rogue assets that our internal scanners consistently overlooked. Its ability to classify and group assets by exposure level allows us to build risk-prioritization models more effectively.

Cons: I would like to see more automated remediation recommendations integrated into the workflow. While UI scalability is strong, the visualization layer could be better optimized for handling larger asset inventories.

Pros: With RiskProfiler, we consolidated phishing detection, cloud asset visibility, and third-party monitoring into one system. That consolidation helped reduce complexity and budget. Onboarding took just 30 minutes with live help. Every module feeds into the next, and the cross-correlation makes prioritization easy and reporting effortless.

Cons: We would love to see mobile-friendly dashboards for exec visibility on the go. While we can share PDFs and email reports, an adaptive UI or lightweight mobile app would add flexibility. We know the team is collecting feedback for roadmap items, and this one feels like an easy win.

Pros: We uncovered typosquat domains, fake portals, and vendor leaks in our first week. RiskProfiler’s modules all talk to each other, so every alert is contextualized. Their support walked us through best practices during setup. The platform is simple to use and packed with the kind of detail our team needs.

Cons: We had to adjust some SLA expectations across teams as the volume of surfaced threats increased. RiskProfiler shows the full picture, which can be overwhelming at occasions.

Pros: The platform helped us correlate cloud exposures with leaked credentials and phishing infrastructure targeting our domain. We no longer need to piece data together across systems. The guided onboarding took less than an hour, and the interface is clean once configured. This platform has become part of our daily workflow.

Cons: Initial role management felt limited. We struggled with restricting views to specific domains or business units. RiskProfiler’s team provided quick workarounds via tagging and saved filters. We’ve since built better access structures using custom views and the platform’s support for scoped alert subscriptions.

Pros: RiskProfiler uncovered external exposures, flagged phishing kits, and monitored our third-party vendors within a unified dashboard with a single panel view. Contextual alerts let us take decisive action fast. The onboarding call was efficient, and our team felt supported throughout the setup. This is the most complete platform we’ve used for external threat defense.

Cons: Some notifications overlapped early on before we tuned severity thresholds. Once suppression filters were added, alert fatigue dropped. Initial noise is understandable given how much the platform surfaces by default. Their customer success team helped us structure alerts around business-critical exposures, which really improved day-to-day operational clarity.

Pros: We liked how RiskProfiler breaks down silos. Whether it's brand protection, vulnerability exposure, vendor risk, or physical threats, everything is monitored, scored, and correlated automatically. The contextual insights, zero-false-positive detection, and fast reporting give our security and GRC teams a shared, real-time view of all critical threats and gaps.

Cons: The review and approval process for compliance controls works well, but could benefit from more flexible workflow assignments.

Pros: RiskProfiler gives us full control over our external attack surface. It continuously discovers and monitors assets, domains, subdomains, cloud apps, IPs, and flags exposures in real time. The contextual insights tied to each asset help us prioritize remediation with clarity. Shadow IT visibility alone has saved us from repeated misconfigurations.

Cons: A feature to flag assets by lifecycle status (e.g., deprecated, unknown, orphaned) using AI-based heuristics would help us clean up our inventory faster and reduce noise from non-critical endpoints.

Pros: The dark web monitoring is proactive and incredibly detailed. It detects exposed credentials, brand mentions, executive targeting, and PII leaks with context we can act on. This capability alone helped us uncover a threat campaign before it escalated. We’ve stopped multiple breaches thanks to these timely alerts and insights.

Cons: During heavy analysis sessions, we occasionally experience minor lagging or slower UI responsiveness.

Pros: The third-party and fourth-party risk monitoring is incredibly robust. RiskProfiler alerts us in real time when a vendor’s security posture changes, and it automatically dispatches updated questionnaires. We no longer wait for quarterly reviews; we act on supplier risks as they happen, which has significantly improved our compliance and oversight.

Cons: While the platform is highly intuitive, native language support for international vendor users is limited. Adding multilingual interfaces or translated guidance for third-party collaborators would enhance usability during questionnaire completion and streamline engagement with non-English-speaking partners during security event follow-ups.

Pros: RiskProfiler gives us full visibility into our exposed digital assets, including subdomains, IPs, and shadow IT. The platform’s rapid detection and contextual asset mapping let us prioritize critical risks fast. Having all this unified with phishing, vulnerability, and brand intelligence under one roof has streamlined our entire threat management workflow.

Cons: A guided setup for alert calibration based on industry or company size would help newer teams reduce early-stage signal overload.

Pros: RiskProfiler provides a 360-degree view of our threat environment. Its ability to uncover exposed IPs, misconfigured assets, and third-party risks in real time is incredibly powerful. We particularly value the supply chain intelligence, which uses thousands of modules to identify threats within our vendor ecosystem—making third-party risk measurable and manageable.

Cons: Setting up custom modules for specific use cases—like risk scoring for smaller vendors—required deeper configuration. While the flexibility is great, more built-in examples or guided templates would reduce time-to-insight. That said, the support team was responsive, and after the initial tuning, performance and precision were excellent.

Pros: RiskProfiler delivers comprehensive, real-time visibility across our external digital assets, from IP-level discovery to geo-mapped threat profiling. The attack path analysis is particularly valuable, simulating real-life attack scenario from initial access to critical infrastructure. Combined with brand monitoring and multilingual tracking, it gives us unmatched situational awareness across the web.

Cons: The platform’s extensive capabilities require an initial learning curve, especially for less mature teams. Some alert customizations and integrations take effort to fine-tune. However, once configured, it delivers significant security and operational value.

Pros: RiskProfiler's platform does a good job at presenting data in a simple dashboard with clean visual element. Moving between different chart and graphs are easy and we get the complete picture with proper context, helping us with priotization and mitigation. The implementation was done within an hour and it started presenting the data in the following hour. But, one thing I will mention is, the tool is a better support with the oversight of a security expert or a technical expert familiar with security concepts. Otherwise, it can be quite challenging in the initial days.

Cons: The platform is complex in its presentation, making it difficult for team members with lack of security background to understand or handle the system.

Pros: RiskProfiler is a external threat exposure management platform that seemlessly integrated with our system and cloud environment. The service is quick to implement and setting up is completely guided. Their brand intelligence module is a standout in detecting phishing scams and impersonation attempts at real time. Overall, it was a good experience.

Cons: Their dashboard is complicated and offer multitude of complex data. Now, it might be great for larger organization with security teams but posed a challenge for our team.

Pros: Riskprofiler offers comprehensive monitoring and threat detection support with robust AI powered features. The solution's EASM & CASM features along with brand risk & supply chain threat management detection capabilities enhances effectivity and quality of response.

Cons: We did not find anything to dislike about the product yet. However, we feel the product sometimes glitches with large influx of data.

Pros: RiskProfiler enhances the threat detection efforts with real time monitoring. Its intuitive dashboard makes it easy to stay up to date with the security posture in real time.

Cons: The module doesn't come with upfront pricing points making the initial decision making process quit challenging.