Rating
4.7
32 reviews
Starting price
$30
Other
Categories
11
Founded
2021
Employees
130
Funding
59.5M
Series B
Monitor everything you run in your cloud without compromising on cost, granularity, or scale. groundcover is a full stack cloud-native APM platform designed to make observability effortless so that you can focus on building world-class products. By leveraging our proprietary sensor, groundcover unlocks unprecedented granularity on all your applications, eliminating the need for costly code changes and development cycles to ensure monitoring continuity.
Ad spend / mo
$8K
55 paid keywords
Paid visits / mo
1,896
Organic keywords
3,223
Organic visits / mo
3,681
Authority
35
1,137 ref domains
Creatives run
100
as Groundcover Inc.
Active now
5
last 14 days
Advertising since
Feb 2023
3+ yrs running
Last seen
today
still active
Running 24 ads on LinkedIn as groundcover - a paid B2B channel, on top of any Google/Capterra spend.
The shared messaging across Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Platform advertisers - the validated angles to copy. See the niche →
(32 reviews)
Great monitoring and alerting tool, a one-stop shop for all your monitoring, no need to have multiple products. enough to have just this one
Pros: Awesome product, allows us to monitor metrics, logs, traces, events all in the same dashboard. Alert creation is very is to create. Customer support is one of the best I have enqountered with almost imidiate response
Cons: It might have some issues with handling huge amounts of data, but they have worked with us closely and we managed to eliminate this issues almost entirely
Ilya P. · SRE · Computer & Network Security · April 25, 2026
Pros: Logging and availability of all important debugging tools
Cons: Log size is limited to a certain length, an option could be given to view large logs on a separate page if required.
Nishant H. · Software Engineer · Retail · November 30, 2024
Groundcover has been an excellent addition to our toolkit! We successfully replaced both New Relic and Kibana, streamlining our observability stack and enhancing visibility across the board. The real-time metrics and seamless setup made the transition effortless, and the intuitive dashboards provide a comprehensive view of our system’s health at a glance. Groundcover not only improved performance insights but also reduced our operational overhead. It’s a powerful solution for teams looking for efficient, straightforward observability without the complexity of traditional tools. Highly recommended!
| Category | Page | Rank | Placement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observability | 1 | 16 | - |
| Log Analysis | 1 | 19 |
Domain confidence 99%
| Keyword they bid on | CPC | Pos | % budget | Landing page |
|---|
Switching Monitoring Tools? - Datadog Alternative
BYOC model keeps all telemetry in your own cloud. Full visibility at a fraction of cost. APM, logs, infra and LLM observability in one unified platform.
https://www.groundcover.com › comparison › vs-datadog
Switching Monitoring Tools? - Compare Side by Side
BYOC model keeps all telemetry in your own cloud. Full visibility at a fraction of cost. groundcover uses eBPF for zero instrumentation.
https://engage.groundcover.com › comparison › vs-datadog
Switching Monitoring Tools? - BYOC Observability
APM, logs, infra and LLM observability in one unified platform. 14-day enterprise trial. BYOC model keeps all telemetry in your own cloud. Full visibility at a fraction of cost. Full Visibility. Install in No Time. Signup Free Today.
https://www.groundcover.com › comparison › vs-datadog
Switching Monitoring Tools? - Deploy in Minutes
BYOC model keeps all telemetry in your own cloud. Full visibility at a fraction of cost. APM, logs, infra and LLM observability in one unified platform.
https://www.groundcover.com › engage › comparison › vs-datadog
Switching Monitoring Tools? - Datadog Alternative
BYOC model keeps all telemetry in your own cloud. Full visibility at a fraction of cost.
https://engage.groundcover.com › comparison › vs-datadog
Pros: The ease of setup, efficient performance insights, and reduced operational overhead make Groundcover a powerful and worthwhile solution
Cons: The UI could use some refinement, as it doesn’t yet match the polish of other tools in the market
Rakesh R. · Software Engineer · Information Technology and Services · November 7, 2024
Groundcover has been a great addition to our DevOps toolkit. It’s easy to implement and integrates smoothly with Kubernetes, delivering efficient, real-time insights with minimal overhead. The proactive alerts and reliable monitoring have improved our ability to resolve issues quickly, enhancing application stability. Plus, the responsive support team adds to the positive experience.
Pros: Groundcover is highly user-friendly, with an intuitive interface that makes setup and daily use easy, even for newcomers. Its eBPF-based approach delivers efficient, real-time insights without high resource costs. Integration is seamless, allowing it to fit smoothly into our existing stack, and we rely on it frequently due to reliable anomaly detection and proactive alerts. Customer support is also responsive and knowledgeable, making the experience even better.
Cons: While excellent for Kubernetes, Groundcover's limited support for traditional on-premise and hybrid environments makes it less suited for non-cloud-native or legacy systems.
Karmanya S. · SDE · Consumer Goods · November 7, 2024
Groundcover has been a valuable addition to our monitoring toolkit. The ease of setup, combined with insightful telemetry capabilities, has significantly improved our ability to track and troubleshoot in testing and production environments. It provides the flexibility and data visualization we need, making it easier to maintain a stable, high-performing system.
Pros: One of the standout features of Groundcover is how straightforward it is to set up telemetry metrics for Playwright with Grafana integration. The platform makes it remarkably easy to configure and visualize performance metrics, allowing our team to monitor test environments and application behaviors in real time without hassle.
Cons: While generally effective, there are minor aspects that could use a bit of polishing for a more seamless experience. Sometimes some dashboards take some time to populate and page sometimes needs to be refreshed, which is just annoying but fine overall.
Sergei R. · QA Engineer · Defense & Space · November 5, 2024
Pros: $8e
Cons: There are a couple of things that could use some work. Sometimes, the queries can be a bit slow to pull up data, and they’ll randomly get stuck. Also, the filter sections can feel a bit complicated, navigating them isn't always the easiest.
Rama K. · Cloud Engineer · Computer & Network Security · October 29, 2024
Overall, groundcover is a good product with potential. While it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of more developed options, its affordability makes it a solid choice. Looking forward to future updates that enhance its features.
Pros: The pricing is a major advantage, offering good value for the features available. It's an efficient solution for those on a budget.
Cons: Compared to other full-fledged products, there are areas that could use improvement. Some functionalities feel limited.
Steve L. · Software Engineer · Computer Software · October 17, 2024
Overall, groundcover has been a solid choice for keeping track of our data pipelines and logs in Kubeflow. As someone still in the learning phase, it’s been really helpful in making complex processes easier to monitor. The only thing is that the dashboard can get complicated at times due to so many logs being tracked. But, the search functionality gives clear indications. So, it's all set for me
Pros: What I liked the most about groundcover is how easily it integrates with Kubeflow for monitoring data pipelines. The real-time log tracking and observability features are a big plus, especially when dealing with complex workflows. It simplifies tracking down issues by giving clear insights into what’s happening at each stage of the pipeline. The interface is intuitive, which made it easier for me, even as an intern, to get the hang of it quickly.
Cons: One downside I noticed is that the tool can be a bit resource-intensive, especially when running multiple simultaneous jobs. It could slow things down if the infrastructure isn't strong enough, which is something to keep in mind. I personally haven't faced such an issue but have heard from my fellow-mates
Pushpak R. · Data Science Intern · Computer Software · October 16, 2024
Overall experience is good. Been using groundcover for last 40 days. Couple of issues like screen resolution and when the time range is large, it says unable to fetch data please reduce time range. I worked on OTEL integration and alert migration. Faced few issue while writing alert queries but GC team helped with it.
Pros: Getting all in one place. UI is very good and easy to use. Most liked feature is where I get to select "ONLY" while filtering out. Another thing I get to monitor all resources and infrastructure at one place which helps in monitoring our services.
Cons: Screen resolution is the issue, sometimes I can not fully see the traces or logs page which come in right bottom. In monitor I am able to see them properly but when I open in laptop, I dont get to see them properly.
Dinesh K. · Software Engineer · Logistics and Supply Chain · October 16, 2024
Overall a solid product that is comparable to other big name monitoring solutions. Expert level support and always able and willing to help when needed.
Pros: New features often, comparable to monitoring apps like datadog, simple to read charts, and intuitive UI
Cons: UI can be sluggish at times, occasional errors when trying to load pages
Joe S. · Senior Site Reliability Engineer · Computer & Network Security · October 15, 2024
Pros: Facebook's Groundcover initiative stands out as a significant innovation in building scalable, efficient, and open-source cloud-native observability tools. What I appreciate most about it is how it seeks to empower developers with deep insights into their infrastructure and applications without compromising on performance or scalability. By focusing on providing real-time, granular visibility into cloud environments, Groundcover helps teams identify issues faster and optimize systems more effectively. Additionally, its commitment to open-source allows a broader community to contribute, learn, and benefit from cutting-edge observability practices. This fosters collaboration and accelerates innovation in cloud-native solutions.
Cons: What I like least about Facebook's Groundcover is the potential complexity that comes with implementing and managing it in large-scale environments. While it's designed to offer deep observability, the extensive amount of data it gathers can sometimes overwhelm teams if they don't have the proper strategies in place to handle and analyze that information efficiently. Additionally, for smaller teams or organizations without dedicated DevOps resources, the learning curve and maintenance efforts required to fully leverage Groundcover’s features could be daunting, making it harder for them to extract meaningful value quickly.
Ashwat P. · Software engineer · Information Technology and Services · October 15, 2024
Pros: liked the traces functionality, helps me track all requests that are sampled, gives an overall idea of any new change going live to prod.
Cons: Data consistency is something that can be improved going forward. Makes it difficult to rely at times.
Vaibhav E. · Software Engineer · Supermarkets · October 15, 2024
amazing!! setup was very quick and easy , their support team is great and responsive , and the product just keeps growing in the best directions
Pros: ease of use , support, pricing, wide coverage
Cons: no custom reports options , Grafana is not the easiest to manage
Shimon E. · DevOps Lead · Computer Software · October 13, 2024
Pros: all I need in one place: metrics, logs, traces etc.
Cons: history limited to 2 days not many protocol supported
Raman V. · devops · Computer Games · October 10, 2024
Overall i would really recommend to think about using it as observability solution at your company. It is really robust and operates smoothly
Pros: It's a very useful tool to help monitor, store logs and metrics. For sure i would like to mention their very helpful support that can help with anything groundcover related.
Cons: To be honest i would have to be very picky to state any true downsides of groundcover
Jakub F. · Site Reliability Engineer · Computer Games · October 10, 2024
Pros: Very easy to see complicated data. See log trace with great filter feature.
Cons: In first look it look cheap product, but after digging in it very compact and powerfull.
Oshri M. · Data engineer · Insurance · January 24, 2024
Pros: Makes work much easier. For example, finding logs.
Cons: Takes some time getting used to it but after a while its fine.
Ben P. · Software developer · Computer & Network Security · January 24, 2024
Pros: A lot of important data is exposed, this helps a lot to debug our production
Cons: As a new user i find it hard to get into all of the abilities i have in groundcover
Yair Z. · Software Engineer · Computer Software · January 21, 2024
Pros: It is pretty easy and fast to setuo, and the UI is simple and understandable, but feature-rich.
Cons: The default setup had some stability issues at first, but the groundcover team was very helpful to solve them.
Benas T. · Devops Engineer · Financial Services · January 17, 2024
Pros: Easy to navigate and search logs. Shows good metrics pods-wise
Cons: Hard to find the details of a specific log
Anonymous User · Senior Software Engineer · Computer Software · January 15, 2024
It was very refreshing experience to setup such tool so quickly and get value out of it even quicker. Free plan is perfect for evaluation, even month-long, as the only limitation is a number of seats.
Pros: It is super easy to install (installer is clever enough to ask about kubernetes node taints required to be able to provision all nodes), just few steps in small cli tool. All the data is aggregated and displayed in meaningful way right at the front page, no need to spend hours learning documentation on how setup and use the tool. Very intuitive tool, focused on providing insight into health / state of k8s cluster and services and it does it really well. Historical data (events, logs, traces, metrics) allows you to quickly figure out issues that happened last night leaving no room for guess-work.
Cons: At this point it is missing eBPF support for MSSQL, navigating through distributed traces could be improved (group them by transaction type and aggregate based on that).
Marek O. · Senior Software Developer · Financial Services · January 15, 2024
Pros: Run fast in high scale . gives you a very good and deep insights for your apps and network / resources
Cons: don't have any yet I really like your product - I came from Nokia and we implement something similar but this is by far better
Guy P. · SW engineer · Security and Investigations · January 15, 2024
Pros: We liked the idea of hosting data in our cloud account and at the same time having the ability to use the service as SaaS. We also liked the ability to have fully managed observability service as such a low cost.
Cons: groundcover services are still maturing. We had to request couple of features that do not exist yet.
Arman T. · Principal Engineer · Computer Software · January 15, 2024
groundcover offers an impressive experience from the user interface to the user experience. It stands out for its eBPF-powered technology, allowing comprehensive observability in modern production environments without compromising cost, granularity, or scale. The platform's ease of use and customer support are highly rated, adding to its overall appeal as a reliable monitoring solution
Pros: The most standout aspect of groundcover is its compatibility and native integration with EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service), which enables rapid installation and provides a complete observability platform. It's particularly efficient in terms of resource usage, maintaining a minimal footprint on the infrastructure.
Cons: Groundcover thrives in Kubernetes (K8s) environments, delivering top-notch performance. While it may not be as immediate in non-EKS settings, it still supports various integrations.
Ron F. · DevRel · Computer Software · January 15, 2024
Very good, we have been with them since the beginning of 2023 and after experiencing the likes of DataDog, Dynatrace and Instana they have been a breath of fresh air with VERY predictable and reasonable pricing and a support team that is very eager to help out when you need them. Even going above and beyond and advising on how to use the data that is gathered by them inside your infrastructure and notifying you on how future changes might affect the usage of that raw data from the deployed databases.
Pros: Easy setup, simple pricing model no hidden fees. Full control over retention without affecting cost. Mostly used eBPF integrations out of the box. Simple UI that gets directly to the point.
Cons: Some eBPF integrations not yet available
Julius Á. · CTO · Computer Software · January 15, 2024
- |
| Database Monitoring | 1 | 23 | - |
| Network Troubleshooting | 1 | 24 | - |
| Log Management | 2 | 9 | - |
| DevOps | 2 | 16 | - |
| Application Performance Management | 2 | 24 | - |
| Cloud Management | 2 | 28 | - |
| Server Monitoring | 2 | 28 | - |
| Network Monitoring | 2 | 37 | Shortlist |
| IT Management | 4 | 2 | Shortlist |